A Test for the 'test' of Distinctiveness - The Saga Continues...

January 2013

Abstract

A primary consideration prior to registering a mark for or on behalf of a client is whether it is “distinctive” as opposed to merely “descriptive”. In recent times, examiners in Australia appear to have become increasingly stringent about whether a mark is indeed “distinctive”. Take away points for practitioners: • An increased threshold for “distinctiveness” in Australia may be seen to encourage innovation as opposed to create a monopoly; • A “distinctive” mark is not the same as “well-known” mark; • Distinctiveness may arise in a registration context as well as in defensive actions.

Author

Sarah Hinchliffe

Barrister and Solicitor (HCA, Vic), The College of William and Mary, Australia

Sarah is a Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of Australia and Supreme Court of Victoria, and has practical experience in the area of taxation law having worked for the Australian Taxation Office and in private legal practice. Sarah has been the Director of a boutique law firm, Princeton Legal (Hinchliffe Legal), since 2010. In addition to her work and engagement in the legal profession, Sarah is a Teaching Fellow (Teaching Specialist) in Taxation at the University of Melbourne. Sarah teaches in the postgraduate Masters program and has also taught at a postgraduate level at Monash University, Victoria University and for the Taxation Institute of Australia. Sarah is an Associate member of the Law Institute of Victoria and of the Taxation Institute of Australia. She is also a member of the Taxation and Revenue Committee and the Intellectual Property and Information Technology Committee at the Law Institute of Victoria. Sarah has been an external editor for the Law Institute Journal and she has been engaged by the Productivity Commission as a consultant. Her research interests are primarily in the areas of taxation law and intellectual property. In relation to the former, direct taxation, taxation compliance and international taxation; and in relation to the latter, Chinese, Canadian, European and American intellectual property law. Sarah has published in these respective areas, and she has also delivered seminars in the area of taxation (including USA, UK and Australian taxation laws) as part of the Asian Institute of International Financial Law seminar program at the University of Hong Kong.

Company

The College of William and Mary

The College of William and Mary, Mason School of Business: The Mason School of Business can lay claim to the spirit of revolution and take up the business of rebuilding the global economy by training the next generation of principled business leaders who will imagine the great business opportunities of the day and seize them. The entrepreneurial spirit that is the cornerstone of American business is as alive and as important as ever and lives on at the Mason School of Business.

This article is based on the panel discussion “IP Strategy and AI – Industry Perspective,” which Sonja London moderated at the Helsinki IP Summit 2025. The discussion brought together IP...Read more

Pirke Fustinoni

Vice President IP & Tech Legal, Metso Corporation, Finland

Sonja London

Founder, Advisor, Fearless IP, Finland

Mika Timmerbacka

Director of Intellectual Property, UPM-Kymmene, Finland

Heidi Adler

Director, Intellectual Property Rights, ORION Corporation, Finland

The Interplay between Antitrust Law and Intellectual Property Law in South Africa: A Critical Analysis of the OECD Recommendation on Intellectual Property Rights and Competition

The interplay between competition law and intellectual property remains the subject of much debate. Intellectual property creates monopolistic rights to protect and reward innovation and incentivise creators; whilst competition law...Read more

Madelein Kleyn

Chief Legal and IP Officers, Omnisient Rf Pty, South Africa

Michael Currie

Partner, Primerio, South Africa

Stephany Torres

Senior Associate, Primerio, South Africa

Joshua Eveleigh

Associate (designate), Primerio, South Africa

A Gold Standard for Clean Room Development to Protect From Intellectual Property Infections

In many situations, a company encounters intellectual property that it cannot allow to spread to a product in development. One example is a joint development project between two companies where...Read more

Bob Zeidman

President, Zeidman Consulting, USA

Patent law differs in each country, but there are some important equitable doctrines that apply across borders. One such a doctrine is prosecution history estoppel. The term Estoppel ...Read more

Roy Girasa

Professor of Law, Pace University, USA

Madelein Kleyn

Chief Legal and IP Officers, Omnisient Rf Pty, South Africa

Mark McCareins

General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA

Shafaq Akhtar

Other, University of Law, UK

A Test for the 'test' of Distinctiveness - The Saga Continues...

Abstract

Author

Company

The College of William and Mary

Related Papers