LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Agentic AI and Liability

April 2026Artificial IntelligenceBanking & Finance

Abstract

Agentic AI represents the current frontier of generative AI — and a fundamental shift in what AI systems do. Unlike earlier AI tools that process data or respond to prompts, agentic systems autonomously take actions, make decisions, and increasingly operate with little to no human oversight. The distinction is best illustrated by contrast. Classical software follows explicit rules: "when the price exceeds X, sell." An AI agent given the instruction "optimize procurement costs for Q3" determines for itself which suppliers to contact, what terms to propose, and how aggressively to negotiate. The deployer has delegated not just execution, but judgment. This shift in autonomy carries a corresponding shift in consequence. A conversational AI that drafts a flawed recommendation does not, by itself, act on it. An agentic system can - move money, place orders, delete records, send communications, deploy code - all without requiring human approval at each step. Equipped with web browsers, APIs, and access to live databases, an AI agent operates in an environment too complex to fully constrain through sandboxed permissions alone. Even a well-designed agent, deployed in a sufficiently intricate business environment, will take actions its deployer cannot entirely foresee.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Authors

Matthias Artzt

Senior Legal Counsel, Deutsche Bank AG, Germany

John deVadoss

Co-Founder, NeuralFabric Corp. (acquired by Cisco Systems), USA

Related Papers

Regulating AI in the UK: A Patchwork, a Plan, and What In-House Counsel Should Do About Both
The United Kingdom does not have an AI law. It has no AI regulator. It has no single, binding set of rules governing how artificial intelligence is developed, deployed or...Read more
Portrait image of Winona Chan
Winona Chan
Legal Counsel, Moneybox, UK
Operating in a New Frontier: AI Use Cases, Business Risks, and the Regulatory Policy Outlook
We are living in an era where artificial intelligence (AI), specifically generative AI, is reshaping many facets of our daily lives, from the way we work and communicate, to having...Read more
Portrait image of Muyiwa Odeniyide
Muyiwa Odeniyide
Director & Associate General Counsel, Nasdaq, USA
Safeguarding privacy and fairness: the role of AI in fraud detection and AML within the recent EU legal framework developments
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly pivotal role in fraud detection and anti-money laundering (AML) efforts, offering enhanced capabilities to identify and prevent illicit activities. This paper explores the...Read more
Portrait image of Enik Pogace
Enik Pogace
Head of Employee Relations Division, Bank of Albania, Albania
AI & the GDPR: How to Reconcile Both Areas from the European Law Perspective
Artificial intelligence is the latest in a long wave of disruptive technology, offering significant benefits but also creating risks if deployed in an uncontrolled manner. The EU AI Act ...Read more
Portrait image of Matthias Artzt
Matthias Artzt
Senior Legal Counsel, Deutsche Bank AG, Germany