LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

R&D Based Pharmaceutical Companies Vs. Generic Companies: A False Dichotomy?

April 2012Intellectual PropertyPharmaceutical

Abstract

As recently as a decade ago, there was a clear line separating R&D-based pharmaceutical companies and generic companies; on one side were innovator pharmaceutical companies focused on developing innovative new medicines, and on the other were generic companies focused on copying those medicines once they lost exclusivity. That clear division, however, has become blurred in recent years. Due to various factors, many innovative pharmaceutical companies are seeking new revenue opportunities by either cultivating an in-house generics business or partnering with generic companies to manufacture their branded products; generic companies, which primarily focused on generic medicine production, are increasingly beginning to recognize the benefits of innovation and the more lucrative market for these products. The question then becomes, are partnerships/collaborations among the two industries and these ‘hybrid’ pharmas now the way of the future? And if so, can this new model, supported by a strong intellectual property framework, be used to spur local innovation in emerging markets to tackle the burden of diseases endemic to these countries?

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Sharon Reiche

Corporate Counsel, Intellectual Property Policy, Pfizer Inc, USA

Related Papers

March-In Rights at a Crossroad: What Biopharma Needs To Know Under Trump Administration
Few pieces of legislation have shaped the modern innovation landscape as profoundly as the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. By allowing universities, small businesses, and non-profit organizations to retain ownership...Read more
Portrait image of Joanna Brougher
Joanna Brougher
Owner & Principal, BioPharma Law Group PLLC, USA
Portrait image of Bhavya Bhardwaj
Bhavya Bhardwaj
Student, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Patent Strategies for Attenuated Pathogen Vaccines
Malaria is a major health concern for people traveling to and living in malaria-endemic areas, causing 249 million clinical cases and 608,000 deaths in 2022, numbers essentially unchanged over the...Read more
Portrait image of David Dolberg
David Dolberg
Senior Director of Intellectual Property, Sanaria Inc., USA
Ways to Avoid Having your Patents Cellected*
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit caused frustrations when it decided to affirm the U.S. Patent Office’s findings that claims in four patents were unpatentable because they are...Read more
Portrait image of Tom Irving
Tom Irving
Partner, Marbury Law Group, USA
Portrait image of Xiaoguang Michelle Gao
Xiaoguang Michelle Gao
Associate VP - Assistant General Patent Counsel, Eli Lilly and Company, USA
Portrait image of Michelle E. O'Brien
Michelle E. O'Brien
Partner, Marbury Law Group, USA
Section 112 Requirements for Life Sciences Patents
35 U.S.C. §112(a) of the US Patent Act is one of the integral parts of the quid pro quo patent system that balances the benefit of disclosure of the invention...Read more
Portrait image of Anagha Tendulkar
Anagha Tendulkar
In-house Patent Counsel, Cipla, India