LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Preserving Patent Rights to Company Technology

April 2016Intellectual PropertyConsultant

Abstract

In the United States, patents are issued to the inventors and control of the prosecution of patent applications is presumed to be with the inventors. However, ownership of those patents and the right to control prosecution of the applications for patent are transferable by the inventors to a third party when appropriate written documents are timely and properly prepared and executed. In the absence of properly prepared Assignments, all rights in the patent will remain with the inventors and each inventor who has not assigned the invention will have the right to independently practice, license or assign the patent to a third party without the consent of the employer or other inventors and the employer will have rights to the invention only from the assignees. While the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has established procedures for a company to assert its rights in inventions of its employees, consultants and contractors, the absence of a proper paper trail and properly executed Assignments and inventor Declarations can jeopardize the ability of the company to secure and protect its patent rights. In particular, the USPTO requires a Declaration signed by each inventor of the claimed invention. In the absence of those Declarations the patent may never issue even if the claims are found to be patentable and if proper Assignments are not recorded with the USPTO a Power of Attorney appointing a US attorney or Patent Agent to prosecute the application won't be accepted by the USPTO. These issues become even more complex when the invention is made outside the US and years prior to US filing. The USPTO statutory, regulatory and procedural requirements regarding ownership of patents are addressed and explained.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Authors

Michael Ram

Senior Counsel, Koppel, Patrick, Heybl & Philpott, USA

Brian Fitzpatrick

Associate, Koppel, Patrick, Heybl & Philpott, USA

Related Papers

German Patent Modernisation Act – A Game Changer for Protection of Confidential Information in Patent Litigation?
Protection of confidential information disclosed in litigation used to be insufficient in Germany. For a long time, it was only regulated fragmentarily. Despite the implementation of the Trade Secret Directive...Read more
Portrait image of Nikita Alymov
Nikita Alymov
Attorney-at-law, Hoffmann Eite, Germany
Portrait image of Dirk Schüßler-Langeheine
Dirk Schüßler-Langeheine
attorney-at-law, partner, Hoffmann Eitle, Germany
A right to copy, right?
Copyright is an intellectual property right that vests automatically. The question arises, whether the right has international enforcement due to the nature of the right. Copyright subsists the moment it...Read more
Portrait image of Madelein Kleyn
Madelein Kleyn
CEO, Mad K IP Consulting (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
Freedom to Operate Conundrum
Growing a patent portfolio by protecting the innovation derived from research and development investment is merely the beginning to the creation of value. Freedom to use, sell and otherwise...Read more
Portrait image of Madelein Kleyn
Madelein Kleyn
CEO, Mad K IP Consulting (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
A Personal Journey - Life After In-House
I have been both in-house and in private practice and now have my own brand consulting firm. How I travelled the road to this time in my life is worth...Read more
Portrait image of Kathryn Belleau
Kathryn Belleau
Consultant, Kgb Consulting, Llc, USA