LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

German Patent Modernisation Act – A Game Changer for Protection of Confidential Information in Patent Litigation?

May 2022Intellectual PropertyConsultant

Abstract

Protection of confidential information disclosed in litigation used to be insufficient in Germany. For a long time, it was only regulated fragmentarily. Despite the implementation of the Trade Secret Directive (EU) 2016/943 into German law (Trade Secret Act) in 2019, the legal framework was initially not applicable to patent disputes. During patent litigation, the disclosure of information containing trade secrets is often indispensable to justify certain claims or as a defence to an alleged patent infringement, but parties were discouraged from using the relevant information for lack of appropriate protection. Therefore, the German Parliament approved the Patent Modernization Act on June 10, 2021 including a new provision for the protection of trade secrets in patent litigation (Sec. 145a German Patent Act). According to the new Section 145a, certain provisions of the Trade Secret Act are now applicable in patent disputes, such as the possibility to designate a part of the court file as confidential so that third parties have no access and to establish a confidentiality club. The present paper will illustrate the practical issues with the protection of trade secrets during patent litigation in Germany and analyse the recent development. The authors aim to outline typical situations during patent litigation which will be affected the most by the recent legislative amendment and its impact on patent litigation practice and strategy.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Authors

Nikita Alymov

Attorney-at-law , Hoffmann Eite , Germany

Dirk Schüßler-Langeheine

attorney-at-law, partner , Hoffmann Eitle , Germany

Related Papers

A right to copy, right?
Copyright is an intellectual property right that vests automatically. The question arises, whether the right has international enforcement due to the nature of the right. Copyright subsists the moment it...Read more
Portrait image of Madelein Kleyn
Madelein Kleyn
CEO, Mad K IP Consulting (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
Freedom to Operate Conundrum
Growing a patent portfolio by protecting the innovation derived from research and development investment is merely the beginning to the creation of value. Freedom to use, sell and otherwise...Read more
Portrait image of Madelein Kleyn
Madelein Kleyn
CEO, Mad K IP Consulting (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
A Personal Journey - Life After In-House
I have been both in-house and in private practice and now have my own brand consulting firm. How I travelled the road to this time in my life is worth...Read more
Portrait image of Kathryn Belleau
Kathryn Belleau
Consultant, Kgb Consulting, Llc, USA
Privilege in the International Corporate Context
As corporations become increasing international in the 21st century, in-house counsel located in one country are frequently asked to provide legal advice to employees, executives, and divisions located in different...Read more
Portrait image of Sriranga Veeraraghavan
Sriranga Veeraraghavan
VP, Legal, Xperi Corporation, USA