LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

The Future of U.S. Health Care Reform - What Might Fail; What Might Work

February 2010RegulationGeneral

Abstract

The world has watched with fascination as the United States enters its second year of trying to reform its health care industry. The Herculean effort has come down to a case study in the institutional peculiarities of the United States Senate. What began as a pretty good idea from the Obama Administration survived intact through the House of Representatives, but as it has wended its way through the Senate sausage mill it has transformed into something unrecognizable and unwieldy. A plan whose primary purpose was to accord over 40 million currently uninsured people access to affordable health care has turned into a mandate on the nation to buy policies from private insurers, at prices set by those insurers that are exempt from US antitrust laws, to be paid for in part with taxpayer dollars, that may still be unaffordable to a large number of that 40 million. Even a “public option” – a government-run health insurance alternative to private policies – that would have insured no more than a relatively small number of people, with a policy that no doubt would have offered far less than privately-offered policies, was jettisoned at the behest of just one senator.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Steven Glazer

Administrative Law Judge, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, USA

Related Papers

When the Referee Rewrites the Rulebook: Why FIFA's Governance Dilemma Matters to Every General Counsel
Governance Is Tested When Rules Become Inconvenient Every institution eventually encounters a defining moment. It is rarely triggered by a financial crisis, regulatory investigation or reputational scandal. Rather, it arises when...Read more
Portrait image of Jeffery Tan
Jeffery Tan
Group General Counsel & Chief Sustainability Officer, Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited, Singapore
The Interpretation of EU States National Legislation Through the Lens of EU Directives
If, in the initial legislative stages of the European Coal and Steel Community the decisions addressed directly to the enterprises that activated in this field were the most used instruments,...Read more
Portrait image of Dan Degan
Dan Degan
Lawyer Romania and Adriatic Region, Viatris, Romania
Blockchain: From 'Why' to 'What' and Regulating 'How'
Blockchain has been the technological darling of the financial press in the last year. Once a niche technology familiar only to bitcoin enthusiasts and journalists, blockchain has captured the interest...Read more
Portrait image of Andreas Gustafsson
Andreas Gustafsson
Partner, Stockholm University - Swedish Corporate Governance Institute, Sweden
Portrait image of Jimmy Kvarnström
Jimmy Kvarnström
Head of Nordic/Baltic Legal, Nasdaq, Sweden
Portrait image of Scott Farrell
Scott Farrell
Partner, King & Wood Mallesons, Australia
A Case for Legal Due Diligence in Humanitarian Engagements
Many developing countries have “aspirational” laws, either carry-overs from years of European colonial rule or modeled after European laws (for example, British common law in Anglophone Africa). Rather than having...Read more
Portrait image of Jeffrey Erickson
Jeffrey Erickson
Clinical Professor, The Pennsylvania State University, USA