LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

What Every In-House Lawyer Needs to Know About a UK Competition Commission Inquiry Before it Starts - 10 Suggestions to Help you Manage the Process.

October 2009CompetitionInsurance

Abstract

Two years! That is how long, until very recently, the Competition Commission (“CC”) would normally take to deliver one of its market investigation reports. The CC remedies that result would then normally add at least another 12 months before they are implemented in full (often considerably longer). The proposed remedies would follow at least an initial period of some 6 months after final report publication before parties might see firm proposals on which they will have been asked to comment. If you add to that the likely OFT market study timetable that might have preceeded a CC inquiry (probably at least 6 months to a year) and the follow on OFT full market inquiry period (1 year) if the OFT has found issues worthy of inquiry, then it all means that a relevant market could be facing the glare and focus of investigation under the UK’s regulatory competition regime for at least some 4 years and sometimes its often longer ( just look at groceries, petrol and house builders to name a few). Specifically, the PPI series of inquiries which reported in February 2009 and is currently consulting on proposed remedies (more on this below) first commenced in September 2005 at the OFT. As they say in the States; you do the math!

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Lee Callaghan

General Counsel International Markets. Group Competition Counsel, Aviva, UK

Related Papers

The CMA and FCA. What do we think of it so far?
In any assessment of how these two new regulators are performing, it's necessary to consider why the Government bothered to reform the system at all and what was it trying...Read more
Portrait image of Lee Callaghan
Lee Callaghan
General Counsel International Markets. Group Competition Counsel, Aviva, UK
The War on International Cartels: Traps for the Unwary
It is generally accepted that competition is good for business and good for consumers in part because competition encourages innovation and provides an incentive for businesses to reduce costs and...Read more
Portrait image of Bruce Fox
Bruce Fox
Retired Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary, The Main Street America Group, USA
Portrait image of Casee Sills
Casee Sills
Legal Associate, The Main Street America Group, USA
Predictably Mistaken: The FCA and the use of economics, psychology and consumer bias in their new role of promoting competition in the interests of consumers in financial services in the UK in 2014
Financial services and the new FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) competition role in the UK. Why the changes, how will it work and how should you manage them? • The next phase of...Read more
Portrait image of Lee Callaghan
Lee Callaghan
General Counsel International Markets. Group Competition Counsel, Aviva, UK
The Future of the Insurance Block Exemption Regulation - or How Special is the Insurance Sector?
Subject to certain conditions, the current Insurance Block Exemption Regulation (BER) exempts important forms of cooperation in the insurance industry from the application of the prohibition of anti-competitive practices...Read more
Portrait image of Jeannine Bartmann
Jeannine Bartmann
Head of Competition, IP and IT-Law, Allianz SE, Germany