LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Global spread of DPA regimes: What they mean for multinationals

March 2020Directors and Officers LiabilityGeneral

Abstract

On 31 January 2020, aerospace giant Airbus SE entered into coordinated agreements with the French, UK and US authorities in the largest corruption enforcement action in history. The company was hit with eye-watering penalties – in total, just shy of €3.6 billion – to pay for the sins of systemic corruption over many years. The fines were divided between the authorities: over €2 billion to France’s Parquet National Financier (“PNF”), €991 million to the UK’s Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”), and €525 million to the US Department of Justice (“DoJ”) and Department of State. Airbus had employed the age-old model of using consultants to bribe customers to buy its products. In one case, the company paid $2 million to the wife of an executive of state-owned Sri Lankan Airlines in return for consultancy services on a contract for 14 planes. In its application to UK Export Finance to support the deal, Airbus referred to the consultant first as “he” and then “she”, and later claimed it was a “coincidence” the consultant shared the same name as the executive’s wife. In another case, the company made or promised payments worth €5 million to a consultant who happened to be the close relative of a high-ranking Ghanaian government official. The consultant was assisted in his work by two UK television actors with zero aviation experience.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Daniel Igra

Investigations Counsel, Nokia Corporation, UK

Related Papers

In-House Counsel’s Roles, Responsibilities and Accountabilities to the Board of Directors
There may be attempts by other senior management to unduly influence, or even control, in-house counsel, such that in-house counsel may reasonably believe that their professional legal duties and obligations...Read more
Portrait image of Richard Leblanc
Richard Leblanc
President, Boardexpert com Inc, USA
European Data Protection: A Review of the New Regulatory Framework
With less than two years to go until the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation, in the next in a series of articles on data privacy, Claire Walsh and...Read more
Portrait image of Claire Walsh
Claire Walsh
Cclaw, UK
Duties of Directors in the Maritime/Offshore Verticals in an Age of Maritime Terrorism
We live in an age of maritime terrorism and the consequences are grave for the planet, people and profits. Given the aforementioned, the duties of directors of corporations ought to...Read more
Who Owns the Innovation? IP Title, Start-Up Formation Failures, and the Hidden Cost of Defective Ownership in Investment and Exit Transactions
For in-house counsel advising start-ups, intellectual property is often the principal source of value. Software, technical know-how, inventions, brands, data, content and confidential processes may be more important than physical...Read more
Portrait image of Madelein Kleyn
Madelein Kleyn
CEO, Mad K IP Consulting (Pty) Ltd, South Africa