LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Details Matter: Mitigating M&A Post-Closing Purchase Price Disputes

July 2018Mergers & AcquisitionConsultant

Abstract

A post-closing purchase price dispute is never a pleasant experience. I would venture a guess that no one reading this would willingly be involved in a dispute at all, much less spend significant time and money trying to win an argument regarding the intended meaning of purchase agreement provisions the parties drafted and presumably agreed to months ago. While clearly not intended or desired by transaction parties, post-closing disputes very frequently involve such issues. There is hope, however! Let’s discuss how including, revising or expanding some specific provisions in the purchase agreement can mitigate the severity of such post-closing disputes or potentially prevent them from happening at all. Let’s also discuss how, if a dispute does occur, some specific provisions can assist in focusing the dispute resolution process on the substantive issues rather than on unintended ambiguities in the purchase agreement.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Jerry Hansen

Partner, Forensic Risk Alliance, USA

Related Papers

Mergers and Acquisitions Regulation in Cambodia: A Review of the Revised Law Governing Business Combinations
Over the last decade, the Kingdom of Cambodia has continued to increase its attractiveness to international investors both through consistent economic growth and the on-going reform of its regulatory environment...Read more
Portrait image of Joseph Lovell
Joseph Lovell
Managing Director, IAO Asia, Cambodia
That’s Not the Way We Do It Here: Reconciling Sandbagging Provisions for Multinational Buyers
Although any number of provisions in an M&A purchase agreement can, and are, negotiated with a wide range of individual outcomes, there is often an overarching set of market norms...Read more
Portrait image of Scott Macbeth
Scott Macbeth
Senior Legal Counsel, The Boston Consulting Group, Inc., USA
Between Board Neutrality and Control: Reimagining Hostile Takeover Defences in India with Lessons from Delaware and Asia-Pacific
Hostile takeovers have traditionally played only a limited role in the mergers and acquisitions landscape in India. This is attributable primarily to the ownership structure of most listed Indian companies,...Read more
Portrait image of Vikas Agarwal
Vikas Agarwal
Co-Founder, LegaLogic Consulting, India
Portrait image of Neha Deshmukh
Neha Deshmukh
Legal Advisor, LegaLogic Consulting, India
The rationality of legislators and business realities in M&A processes – the changing role of in-house lawyers – from advisors to strategic partners
The current regulatory environment in the European Union, but also in Poland, poses challenges for businesses that go beyond the traditional legal framework. Dynamic legislative changes, often introduced without public...Read more
Portrait image of Magdalena Kawczynska
Magdalena Kawczynska
Legal Director/CEE&Baltics, Ayvens, Poland