LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Navigating the Brave New World of International Trade Agreements

June 2018InternationalInsurance

Abstract

The world seems to be getting smaller every day. Technology has improved the speed of business travel and all forms of commercial communication to the point where the global market is similar to the U.S. domestic market just a few short decades ago. All of these changes do come with a price, one of which is the political reaction to the ebb and flow of commerce between nations with varying agendas, needs and political necessities, including immigration policies. International trade agreements provide a relatively consistent and enforceable framework to facilitate international trade and as might be expected are subject to the real pressure of international politics. While these pressures may take different shapes and forms, one clearly observable form is through trade barriers implemented by one sovereign nation to control, limit or block trade with one or more other sovereign nations. These trade barriers can be complex to understand and difficult to track as the global political landscape seems to change on a daily basis. For example, the U.S. and other nations seemed to be embracing a more global market under the administration of U.S. President Barak Obama. This direction changed in 2017 when President Donald Trump took office and pushed his agenda against bilateral or even trilateral trade agreements. This comes on the heels of “Brexit,” the United Kingdom’s historic vote to withdraw from the European Union on June 23, 2016, which regardless of the reason or reasons behind the vote signifies a major move away from globalization.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Bruce Fox

Retired Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary, The Main Street America Group, USA

Related Papers

The geopolitical element and business: a framework for in-house counsel
Geopolitics and geoeconomics have assumed an unprecedented centrality for globally active companies, yet many in-house legal functions remain uncertain about how to respond. This article proposes a practical framework for...Read more
Portrait image of Pietro Meineri
Pietro Meineri
Attorney at Law, LL.M. (Harvard Law School), Zurich Insurance Group, Switzerland
Considerations for In-House Counsel in Navigating CFIUS Issues in Cross-Border Transactions
Internal lawyers play a unique role in transactions involving the acquisition of a business, for both acquirers and targets. Frequently, internal lawyers are involved in the early stages of a...Read more
Portrait image of Paul Giordano
Paul Giordano
Former General Counsel, Ironshore Inc., USA
Aviva embraces the bear - developing Aviva's new Russian business
When Aviva decided to enter the Russian market, our goal was to establish a top 5 market position over a 5 year period. At that time, we had no local...Read more
Portrait image of Lee Callaghan
Lee Callaghan
General Counsel International Markets. Group Competition Counsel, Aviva, UK
Reforming Shareholders’ Meetings in Italy: Considerations on the Emerging Reform of the Consolidated Finance Act
While this article was in proof, the Italian Government approved the reform of the capital markets framework. At the time of writing, the final consolidated text, although in line with...Read more
Portrait image of Giuseppe Catalano
Giuseppe Catalano
Company Secretary and Head of Corporate Affairs, Assicurazioni Generali, Italy