Parental Liability in EU Competition Law - A Fair Presumption?

Maria Troberg, Senior Legal Counsel, Competition, Nokia, Finland

Under EU competition law, there is a presumption that a parent company with a 100% shareholding in its subsidiary company exercises decisive influence. The European Commission has the power to fine such parent company for the competition infringements of its subsidiary. Irrespective of the parent company’s personal involvement or awareness of the competition infringement, the subsidiary’s conduct is attributed to the parent and both the parent and the subsidiary are held jointly and severally liable for the infringement. This presumption can be rebutted if there is evidence that the subsidiary “acts independently on the market”. It follows in such case that the burden of proof falls on the Commission to demonstrate actual exercise of decisive influence over the day-to-day operations of the subsidiary. Also in the case where the parent does not hold 100% shareholding in its subsidiary, it is (at least in theory) for the Commission to show that the parent in fact exercises a decisive influence.

Maria Troberg is a Senior Legal Competition Counsel at Nokia based in Espoo, Finland. Maria holds an LLM from the College of Europe in Bruges (2008) and from Georgetown University Law Center (2011), where she studied on a Fulbright-Schuman scholarship. Pr

Nokia is a leader in the fields of network infrastructure, location-based technologies and advanced technologies. Headquartered in Espoo, Finland, and with operations around the world, Nokia invests in the technologies of the future. Today, we have three