LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Cash is King in the UK Construction Industry

October 2023ContractConstruction

Abstract

The coronation of the King has long since passed and all celebrations are complete but in these straightened times cash is still the undisputed king in the UK construction industry. Cash flow is paramount and is the life blood of the industry. This was shown in the fall out of Carillion’s insolvency when it was the sub-contractors that had signed up to three months payment terms that went to the wall. Some might say that most small contractors operate without capital, on a “hand to mouth” basis and for that reason are always on the edge of insolvency. They might of course be forced into this position because the building employer or main contractor has not paid them. The principal mechanism for enforcement of payment terms by contractors in the UK is of course Adjudication. If they fall into insolvency, they will face a barrier to enforcement of the Adjudicator’s decision in an application for summary judgment in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC). This is because an Adjudicator’s award of payment to be made is only an interim decision and can be overturned upon a final determination of the dispute by the court. For this reason, the TCC will not enforce the Adjudicator’s decision for payment to be made to an insolvent contractor or sub-contractor unless measures are put in place to “ring fence” the money, so that it can be paid back to the employer or main contractor if they win the case in a final determination of the dispute by the court. What though is the position where the contractor has entered into a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) to try and trade its way out of trouble?

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Anthony Philpott

Barrister, Barrister (Direct Public Access and Authorised Litigator) UK - AP Legal Direct , UK

Related Papers

Reconsidering the use of expertise in disputes related to international construction contracts
Our paper aims to describe the evolution of the role of technical experts in avoidance and management of disputes related to international construction contracts, focusing on the energy sector. From...Read more
Portrait image of Edoardo Marcenaro
Edoardo Marcenaro
Former Head of Legal & Corporate Affairs, Enel Grids srl, Italy
Portrait image of Michela Umbro
Michela Umbro
Legal Counsel, DeliSasson, Italy
The Roads to Freedom of Contract
John Paul Sartre’s philosophical novels that make up the trilogy of “the Roads to Freedom”, first screened by the BBC in the 1970’s, were given a complete re-run recently, all...Read more
Portrait image of Anthony Philpott
Anthony Philpott
Barrister, 10 King's Bench Walk, Temple, UK
‘Right of Access to the Site Under FIDIC – How To Properly Cooperate in the Investment Process’
Contemporary infrastructural investment projects are characterized by the increasing complexity of innovative technological and architectural solutions of the objects being the main subject of implemented undertakings. The high level...Read more
Portrait image of Grzegorz Pawlowski
Grzegorz Pawlowski
Legal and Corporate Affairs Director, DCT Gdansk SA, Poland
Convertible Contracts:The In-house Counsel Perspective
For its fast track projects, the Oil & Gas industry privileges Lump Sum contract types even in cases where definition of the project is not sufficiently advanced. “Fast-tracking” can be...Read more
Portrait image of Cristina Montanaro
Cristina Montanaro
Senior Legal Counsel, TechnipFMC, Italy